Acer Aspire XC-605: A Late Upgrade in Times of Skyrocketing Storage Prices

Veröffentlicht am Published on 发表于 22. April 2026 um at , 22:04

A few weeks ago, a friend asked me what the problem might be when all browsers stop working. More specifically: Whenever they tried to launch either Microsoft Edge or Mozilla Firefox, they only got an error message saying they didn’t have sufficient permissions. It was a strange error – why would permissions suddenly be missing after years of trouble-free operation?

After some back-and-forth, we managed to install a new version of Mozilla Firefox with step-by-step phone instructions and finally installed AnyDesk using a working browser, which allowed me to take a look at the problem myself. That’s when a surprise came to light: The PC has been running Windows 8.1 Home, 64-bit, just as it always has!

Having gone without any updates for quite some time (end of life was on January 10, 2023!), the problem ultimately came down to expired root certificates. Continuing to run 8.1 wasn’t a viable option anyway, so I performed an in-place upgrade to Windows 10 22H2 remotely via AnyDesk. That took hours because the factory-installed 3.5″ WD hard drive with 1 TB capacity* is still the boot drive. The already very underpowered fourth-generation dual-core i3 is further severely hampered by the now very limited 4 GB of DDR3 RAM in the form of a single memory module. All in all, a significantly outdated system, but one with the potential to be upgraded very cost-effectively. That’s exactly what I did today, a few days later.

After a deep clean, everything looks so much brighter:

Upgrades

The PC is used solely for viewing photos and occasional web browsing. So there’s no reason to switch to the very latest and most expensive hardware. For a reasonable price, you can still get a lot out of this 2014 Acer Aspire, here’s a comparison of the current components and the planned upgrade:

OriginalPlanned
ProcessorIntel Core i3-4150 (SR1PJ)
Haswell → DT (22 nm)
Stepping C0

2 Cores, 4 Threads
Base clock 3.50 GHz

Cores / No Turbo Boost:
1 – 3.50 GHz
2 – 3.50 GHz



Caches:
L1 : 128 KB  L2: 512 KB  L3: 3 MB

54 Watts TDP
Intel Core i7-4790 (SR1QF)
Haswell → DT Refresh (22 nm)
Stepping C0

4 Cores, 8 Threads
Base clock 3.60 GHz

Cores / max. Turbo-Boost:
1 – 4.00 GHz
2 – 4.00 GHz
3 – 3.90 GHz
4 – 3.80 GHz

Caches:
L1 : 256 KB  L2: 1 MB  L3: 8 MB

84 Watts TDP
GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 4400
GT 1.5

350 – 1150 MHz
Intel HD Graphics 4600
GT 2

350 – 1200 MHz
RAM4 GB SK Hynix (1 x 4 GB)
DDR3-1600, 11-11-11-28 1T (1.5 Volts)
Single-Channel

DIMM (Unbuffered)
1 of 2 Slots used
16 GB Envinda / Crucial (2 x 8 GB)
DDR3-1600, 11-11-11-28 1T (1.5 Volts)
Dual-Channel

DIMM (Unbuffered)
2 of 2 Slots used
Boot deviceHDD WD Blue (1 TB)
WD10EZEX-21M2NA0
7200 rpm / 64 MB Cache
SATA-III
3.5″
SSD Patriot Burst (240 GB)
PBU240GS25SSDR
32 MB DRAM-Cache, TLC
SATA-III
2.5″
Storage deviceHDD WD Blue (1 TB)
WD10EZEX-21M2NA0
7200 rpm / 64 MB Cache
SATA-III
3.5″
Operating systemMicrosoft Windows 8.1 Home (x64)Upgrade to Windows 10 Home, then subsequently to Windows 11 Home (x64)

The UEFI was already up to date; I checked that before taking anything apart. The reason is that newer processors within the same generation are usually only supported by updated microcode in the form of a newer BIOS or UEFI version. The planned i7-4790 is actually a refresh within Haswell-DT, so it’s even newer than the original i7 release models and incompatibilities cannot be ruled out.

Here are the components; everything except the CPU is from my own stash:

Processor replacement

This is incredibly easy thanks to the FC-LGA 1150 socket:

For thermal paste, I used the tried-and-true MX-4 from Arctic* and 99.9% isopropyl alcohol* to clean the components. I added the two new RAM modules, and lo and behold: POST was successful, and it’s running. Everything is recognized correctly in the UEFI. Now I just need to shrink the partitions, clone the hard drive to the SSD, and put everything back together.

Success?

For comparison purposes, I ran Cinebench R23 and the PassMark Performance Test v11.1 on the original hardware at the beginning and then again after the upgrade. Both tests were run on the same Windows 10 Home 64-bit system. This makes it easy to see the performance gains:

Original
i3, 4 GB DDR3, HDD
Upgraded
i7, 16 GB DDR3, SSD
Difference
PassMark
Rating
668.6 Points1150.1 Points+72,02 %
PassMark
CPU
3542.2 Points7584.6 Points+114,12 %
PassMark
2D Graphics
268.8 Points393.6 Points+46,43 %
PassMark
3D Graphics
553.9 Points725.0 Points+30,89 %
PassMark
Memory
1426.1 Points2535.4 Points+77,79 %
PassMark
Disk
1050.4 Points2895.5 Points+175,66 %
Cinebench R23
Single
820 Points873 Points+6,46 %
Cinebench R23
Multi
1960 Points4403 Points+124,64 %

The performance gains are consistently very substantial and extremely noticeable. In particular, the integrated graphics unit – which is slightly more powerful in the i7 than in the i3 – benefits further from dual-channel operation with two memory modules (instead of just one as before). However, due to the patches addressing Spectre and Meltdown as well as other factors, the results do not quite match the reference scores. Here are the Cinebench screenshots:

Next, the PassMark results – though, due to a lack of internet connection at the time of testing, these are only available offline:

Last but not least, here is the HWiNFO overview of the respective configuration:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *